<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://truenicks.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>TrueNicks : Validity, Hypothetical Matings</title><link>http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Validity/Hypothetical+Matings/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Validity, Hypothetical Matings</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Quite Contrary Exceptions</title><link>http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/2009/03/11/quite-contrary-exceptions.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:33089</guid><dc:creator>aporter</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=33089</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/2009/03/11/quite-contrary-exceptions.aspx#comments</comments><description>Alan Porter identifies cases where a poor overall sire line affinity can be improved by other pedigree patterns -- a process aided by additional tools included on the TrueNicks report page....(&lt;a href="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/2009/03/11/quite-contrary-exceptions.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://truenicks.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=33089" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Hypothetical+Matings/default.aspx">Hypothetical Matings</category><category domain="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Pedigrees+and+Breeding/default.aspx">Pedigrees and Breeding</category><category domain="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Validity/default.aspx">Validity</category><category domain="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Other+Breeding+Theories/default.aspx">Other Breeding Theories</category></item><item><title>Reader Q&amp;A: Cost vs. Quality</title><link>http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/2008/08/02/reader-q-amp-a-cost-vs-quality.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:14473</guid><dc:creator>sgillies</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=14473</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/2008/08/02/reader-q-amp-a-cost-vs-quality.aspx#comments</comments><description>Question : My question is whether there a much greater risk factor when considering between two stallions that differ in the fact that one has many proven mares and was a very good performer himself, while the other is a young stallion that is well-bred but has never raced because of an injury, and doesn't yet have a large number of offspring? The two stallions give a similar nick rating. I have a...(&lt;a href="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/2008/08/02/reader-q-amp-a-cost-vs-quality.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://truenicks.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=14473" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Hypothetical+Matings/default.aspx">Hypothetical Matings</category><category domain="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Pedigrees+and+Breeding/default.aspx">Pedigrees and Breeding</category><category domain="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Validity/default.aspx">Validity</category><category domain="http://truenicks.com/cs/blogs/truenicks/archive/tags/Readers_2700_+Questions/default.aspx">Readers' Questions</category></item></channel></rss>